Introduction
In a democracy, having elected governments at the national and state levels is not enough. It's also crucial to have an elected government at the local level to manage local affairs. This government at the village and district level is known as local government. It is the government closest to the common people, dealing with their day-to-day lives and problems.
Why Local Governments?
Local governments are essential for a healthy democracy because they bring governance closer to the people. They operate on the belief that local knowledge and interests are vital for making good decisions and running an efficient, people-friendly administration.
The main advantages of local government are:
- Proximity: It is near the people, making it convenient for them to approach officials with their problems.
- Efficiency: Problems can be solved quickly and at a minimum cost.
- Participation: It allows ordinary citizens to get involved in decisions that affect their lives, needs, and development.
- Accountability: Strong local governments ensure that leaders are directly answerable to the community they serve.
Example
Geeta Rathore, the Sarpanch of Jamonia Talab Gram Panchayat in Madhya Pradesh, transformed her village by renovating water tanks, building a school, and fighting against domestic violence. Her success shows how a proactive local leader can harness community energy for development. This is an example of meaningful participation.
Example
The Gram Panchayat of Vengaivasal village in Tamil Nadu successfully challenged a government order to acquire its land. The High Court ruled in their favor, upholding the constitutional status and powers of the Panchayat. This is an example of a local government ensuring purposeful accountability and protecting local interests.
Strengthening local government is a way of strengthening the democratic process itself. It ensures that tasks that can be performed locally are left in the hands of local people and their representatives.
Growth of Local Government in India
The idea of self-governing village communities is ancient in India, existing in forms like 'sabhas' (village assemblies) and 'Panchayats' (an assembly of five persons).
Modern History
- Lord Rippon, the Viceroy of India, took the initiative in 1882 to create elected local government bodies called local boards.
- Following the Government of India Act of 1919, village panchayats were established in many provinces, a trend that continued after the Government of India Act of 1935.
- During the freedom movement, Mahatma Gandhi was a strong advocate for decentralisation. He believed that strengthening village panchayats was key to empowering people, famously stating, "Independence must begin at the bottom. Thus every village will be a republic..."
After Independence
When the Indian Constitution was being written, the subject of local government was assigned to the States and included in the Directive Principles of State Policy. This meant it was non-justiciable and more of an advisory provision.
Local government did not receive much importance in the original Constitution for two main reasons:
- National Unity: The turmoil of Partition created a need for a strong central government. Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru viewed "extreme localism" as a potential threat to the nation's unity.
- Social Issues: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and others were concerned that the factionalism and caste divisions in rural society would defeat the purpose of local self-government.
Local Governments in Independent India
Before the 73rd and 74th Amendments, the development of local governments was slow and inconsistent.
- The Community Development Programme was launched in 1952 to promote people's participation in local development.
- A three-tier Panchayati Raj system was recommended for rural areas, and some states like Gujarat and Maharashtra adopted it around 1960.
However, these early local bodies faced many problems:
- They lacked sufficient powers and functions.
- They were heavily dependent on state and central governments for funds.
- In many states, elections were indirect or postponed repeatedly.
- Local bodies were often dissolved, and their administration was handed over to government officers.
In 1989, the P.K. Thungon Committee recommended giving constitutional recognition to local government bodies to ensure they had regular elections, defined functions, and adequate funds.
73rd and 74th Amendments
In 1992, Parliament passed the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, which came into force in 1993. These amendments were a major step towards strengthening local government across the country.
- The 73rd Amendment is about rural local governments, also known as Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs).
- The 74th Amendment is about urban local governments, or Nagarpalikas.
Since local government is a 'State subject', the amendments made it mandatory for all states to change their laws to align with the new constitutional provisions within one year.
73rd Amendment
This amendment introduced key changes for Panchayati Raj institutions.
Three-Tier Structure
All states now have a uniform three-tier structure for rural local government:
- Gram Panchayat: At the base, covering a village or a group of villages.
- Mandal (or Block/Taluka) Panchayat: The intermediary level.
- Zilla Panchayat: At the apex, covering the entire rural area of a district.
The amendment also mandated the creation of the Gram Sabha, which includes all adult members registered as voters in the Panchayat area. The role of the Gram Sabha is decided by state law.
Elections
- All three levels of Panchayati Raj institutions are filled by members elected directly by the people.
- The term for each Panchayat body is five years.
- If a state government dissolves a Panchayat early, fresh elections must be held within six months.
Reservations
- One-third of all positions (for both members and chairpersons) are reserved for women.
- Reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) are provided at all three levels in proportion to their population.
- States also have the option to provide reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
Note
These reservations apply to the positions of Chairpersons ('Adhyakshas') as well. This means a Sarpanch could be a Dalit woman or an Adivasi woman, ensuring leadership opportunities for marginalised groups.
Transfer of Subjects
- The amendment identified 29 subjects from the State list and placed them in the Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution.
- These subjects, related to local development and welfare, are to be transferred to the Panchayati Raj institutions.
- However, the actual transfer of these functions depends on the legislation passed by each state.
In 1996, a separate act was passed to extend the Panchayat system to Adivasi-inhabited areas, protecting their traditional rights to manage resources like forests and water.
State Election Commissioner
Each state government must appoint a State Election Commissioner to conduct elections for the Panchayati Raj institutions. This office is autonomous and independent, similar to the Election Commissioner of India.
State Finance Commission
Each state is required to appoint a State Finance Commission every five years. This commission reviews the financial position of local governments and recommends how revenues should be distributed between the state and local bodies.
74th Amendment
The 74th Amendment deals with urban local bodies, or Nagarpalikas. An urban area is defined by the Census of India as having:
- A minimum population of 5,000.
- At least 75% of the male working population in non-agricultural jobs.
- A population density of at least 400 persons per sq. km.
Most of the provisions of the 73rd Amendment—such as direct elections, reservations, a five-year term, and the creation of State Election and Finance Commissions—are also applied to urban local bodies. The functions to be transferred to urban bodies are listed in the Twelfth Schedule of the Constitution.
Implementation of 73rd and 74th Amendments
The constitutional amendments have led to a massive expansion of democratic representation in India.
- Today, there are over 600 Zilla Panchayats, 6,000 intermediary Panchayats, and 2,40,000 Gram Panchayats.
- More than 32 lakh members are elected to these bodies every five years. Of these, at least 13 lakhs are women.
- Reservations have ensured the presence of a large number of women in leadership roles, including over 80,000 women Sarpanchas.
- The social profile of local bodies has changed significantly, with about 6.6 lakh elected members from Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities.
Challenges in Implementation
Despite these successes, local governments face significant challenges:
- Limited Autonomy: Many states have not transferred most of the 29 subjects to local bodies, leaving them with limited power and functions.
- Lack of Funds: Local bodies have very few sources of their own income. Their heavy dependence on state and central governments for funds weakens their ability to function effectively.
- Social Tensions: In some areas, dominant social groups who previously controlled villages resist the shift in power, leading to conflict.
Note
The experience of the last few decades shows that local governments often remain agencies that simply implement schemes designed by the central and state governments, rather than functioning as autonomous units of self-government. There is a wide gap between the legal provisions for decentralisation and the reality on the ground.
Conclusion
True democracy means that power is shared with the people. The laws creating local governments are an important step towards this goal of decentralisation. They give people in villages and cities the opportunity to decide on the policies and programs that affect them. However, the real test of democracy is not just in having good laws but in ensuring they are put into practice effectively. For local governments to be truly empowered, there needs to be a real decentralisation of power and resources from the state and central levels.