Through the Eyes of Travellers
Between the tenth and seventeenth centuries, many people travelled to the Indian subcontinent for various reasons, such as work, trade, pilgrimage, or adventure. These travellers came from different social and cultural backgrounds, which gave them a unique perspective on everyday life in India. Because local writers often took common practices for granted, the accounts of these foreign visitors are incredibly valuable for historians. They noticed and recorded details about customs, beliefs, and social life that might have otherwise been lost.
This chapter focuses on the accounts of three key travellers:
Al-Biruni was a scholar born in 973 in Khwarizm (present-day Uzbekistan), an important center of learning. He was a polyglot, well-versed in languages like Syriac, Arabic, Persian, Hebrew, and Sanskrit. In 1017, when Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni invaded Khwarizm, Al-Biruni was taken to the capital, Ghazni, as a hostage. It was there that his interest in India grew.
He spent years with Brahmana priests and scholars, learning Sanskrit and studying their religious and philosophical texts. This deep study allowed him to write a remarkable book about India.
Al-Biruni’s famous work, the Kitab-ul-Hind, was written in Arabic. It is a detailed and well-organized book with eighty chapters covering a vast range of topics:
His writing style was very systematic, often described as having a "geometric structure." In many chapters, he would:
Al-Biruni was very aware of the challenges he faced in understanding a completely different society. He identified three main "barriers":
Despite these challenges, he relied almost exclusively on Brahmanical texts like the Vedas, Puranas, Bhagavad Gita, and Manusmriti to form his understanding.
Al-Biruni tried to explain the caste system by comparing it to social divisions in other parts of the world. He pointed out that ancient Persia also had four social categories: knights and princes; monks and priests; scientists and physicians; and peasants and artisans. By doing this, he suggested that social division was not unique to India.
However, he also contrasted this with Islam, where he noted that all men were considered equal, differing only in their piety.
Based on his study of Sanskrit texts, he described the four varnas:
While he accepted this textual description, he strongly disapproved of the concept of pollution. He argued that the idea of social pollution went against the laws of nature, where things naturally strive to regain purity, like the sun cleansing the air or salt purifying seawater.
Ibn Battuta, a Moroccan traveller, provides a rich account of the social and cultural life of the subcontinent in the fourteenth century. Born in Tangier to an educated family known for its expertise in Islamic religious law (shari'a), he received a formal education.
Unlike Al-Biruni, who relied on texts, Ibn Battuta believed that experience gained from travel was a more important source of knowledge. He was a passionate traveller who explored new worlds and peoples.
Before arriving in India in 1332-33, Ibn Battuta had already travelled extensively through West Asia, East Africa, and Central Asia. He was drawn to India by the reputation of the Sultan of Delhi, Muhammad bin Tughlaq, who was known as a generous patron of arts and letters.
Ibn Battuta had a special talent for describing things that would have been completely new to his audience. He used comparisons to help his readers visualize these novelties.
Ibn Battuta found the cities in the subcontinent to be prosperous, densely populated, and full of opportunities.
Ibn Battuta was amazed by the efficiency of the postal system, which was crucial for both merchants and the state. There were two types:
This system was remarkably fast. News from spies could travel from Sind to Delhi in just five days, a journey that would otherwise take fifty days.
François Bernier was a French doctor, political philosopher, and historian who travelled to the Mughal Empire in the seventeenth century. He was in India for twelve years, from 1656 to 1668, and was associated with the Mughal court as a physician to Prince Dara Shukoh and later with Danishmand Khan, a noble.
Unlike Ibn Battuta, who was fascinated by the novel, Bernier was more critical and analytical. His approach was to constantly compare what he saw in India with the situation in Europe.
According to Bernier, the biggest difference between Mughal India and Europe was the lack of private property in land. He believed that the emperor owned all the land and distributed it among his nobles. He argued this had disastrous consequences:
This idea of "crown ownership" was a simplification. Mughal documents, like those from Abu'l Fazl (Akbar's chronicler), suggest the state collected a tax on the crop for providing protection, not rent for owning the land. However, Bernier's account was highly influential.
His ideas shaped European thought for centuries, leading to concepts like:
While Bernier's main argument was that the Mughal state was tyrannical, his own descriptions sometimes hinted at a more complex reality.
Bernier described Mughal cities as "camp towns," meaning they existed only to serve the imperial court and would decline if the court moved away. This was another oversimplification, as India had many types of towns—manufacturing centers, trading ports, and sacred pilgrimage sites—that were supported by vibrant merchant communities and professional classes.
The male travellers were often intrigued by the condition of women in the subcontinent. Their accounts provide glimpses into women's lives, though often focused on what they found unusual or shocking.
Ibn Battuta noted that slavery was widespread. Slaves were openly sold in markets and exchanged as gifts.
European travellers like Bernier often used the treatment of women as a key difference between "Western" and "Eastern" societies. He was particularly struck by the practice of sati (the immolation of a widow on her husband's funeral pyre).
However, these accounts often overlooked the broader roles of women. Women's labor was crucial in agriculture and crafts. Women from merchant families were involved in commerce, and it is unlikely that all women were confined to their homes. The travellers' focus on practices like sati and slavery gives us a limited, though important, view of women's lives.
Great job reading through all sections. Ready to test your knowledge and reinforce your learning?