Change and Development in Rural SocietyClass 12 Social Change and Development in India NCERT Solutions

8 Solutions
Generated by KedovoAI
Solution 1 of 8
Q1Questions

Read the passage given and answer the questions: The harsh working conditions suffered by labourers in Aghanbigha were an outcome of the combined effect of the economic power of the maliks as a class and their overwhelming power as members of a dominant caste. A significant aspect of the social power of the maliks was their ability to secure the intervention of various arms of the state to advance their interests. Thus, political factors decisively contributed to widening the gulf between the dominant class and the underclass. i. Why do you think the maliks were able to use the power of the state to advance their own interests? ii. Why did labourers have harsh working conditions?

Solution

i. The maliks were able to use the power of the state to advance their own interests primarily because they belonged to dominant castes and possessed significant economic and political power. According to the chapter, dominant castes are major landowning groups that are economically and politically powerful at the local level. This combination of economic strength (as a landowning class) and social status (as a dominant caste) gives them influence over various arms of the state, such as the police and local administration. They can leverage this influence to ensure that state machinery acts in their favor, for instance, by suppressing labor movements or ignoring the non-payment of minimum wages, thereby protecting and advancing their economic and social interests.
ii. Laborers had harsh working conditions due to the combined effect of the economic and social power of the maliks.
  • Economic Power: The maliks, being the landowners, controlled the most important resource in the rural economy—land. The laborers were often landless and entirely dependent on the maliks for their livelihood. This dependency forced them to accept exploitative conditions, including low wages and insecure employment.
  • Caste Power: The laborers typically belonged to lower castes, while the maliks were from dominant, upper castes. This traditional caste hierarchy reinforced the economic exploitation. Historically, lower castes were subjected to practices like begar (free labor) and were denied the right to own land, creating a system where their labor was commanded by the dominant castes.
  • State Support for Maliks: As mentioned in the passage, the maliks could use their influence to ensure the state machinery supported their interests, leaving the laborers with little to no legal or political recourse against their exploitation.