Journey Inside the AtomClass 9 Science NCERT Solutions

15 Solutions
Generated by KedovoAI
Solution 1 of 15
Q1Revise, Reflect, Refine

Choose the correct options and explain the reason for the correct and incorrect options in the context of Ernest Rutherford's gold foil experiment:

(i)

The experiment clearly showed the existence of neutrons in the nucleus.

(ii)

The results disproved the plum pudding model and led to the idea of a nucleus at the centre of the atom.

(iii)

The large deflection of a few alpha particles indicated that most of the mass of the atom and positive charge are packed into a tiny centre.

(iv)

The way alpha particles were deflected showed that electrons move around the nucleus.

Solution

The correct options are (ii) and (iii).
Explanation for each option:
  • (i) Incorrect. The gold foil experiment provided evidence for a dense, positive nucleus but gave no information about neutrons. Neutrons were discovered much later in 1932 by James Chadwick.
  • (ii) Correct. J. J. Thomson's plum pudding model predicted that alpha particles would pass through the gold foil with only minor deflections. The observation that some alpha particles were deflected by large angles, and a few even bounced back, directly contradicted and disproved this model. This led to the new idea of a central nucleus.
  • (iii) Correct. The alpha particles are positively charged. The fact that a few were deflected at large angles meant they encountered a very strong repulsive force. Rutherford concluded this force must come from a massive, positively charged region concentrated in a tiny volume at the atom's centre, which he called the nucleus.
  • (iv) Incorrect. The experiment did not provide direct evidence about the movement of electrons. It focused on the interaction between alpha particles and the positive part of the atom. Rutherford inferred that electrons must be outside the nucleus to make the atom neutral, and he proposed they orbit the nucleus, but the experiment itself did not show this motion.